Page history
26 July 2017
19 July 2017
beats me
+36
0x184000 analysis - feel free to break this out into its own section if it's cluttery or more is discovered
+53
clarify the intention of cmac check function, this is actually identical to a fix deployed on xbox360 cb
m+19
18 July 2017
→Boot Partitions
+185
→NAND structure
+108
→NAND structure
+105
Has nothing to do with Flash filesystem
-253
condense information
-399
16 July 2017
12 July 2017
11 July 2017
→Keyblob
+272
→Keyblob: Regarding "fun fact: failing this CMAC check will blow fuses"
+379
→Keyblob
+1
fun fact: failing this CMAC check will blow fuses
+81
→Boot Partitions
+601
7 July 2017
6 July 2017
→User Partitions
+67
u64 could also reflect bcpkg size? - this was observed to be larger after 3.0->3.0exfat update
+70
no edit summary
+117
→User Partitions
+222
4 July 2017
→USER
+156
no edit summary
+221
→User Partitions
+167
→User Partitions
+31
→User Partitions
+36
→User Partitions
+113
no edit summary
+332
→SAFE
+78
→PRODINFOF
+144
3 July 2017
2 July 2017
→Boot Partitions
+17
the byte at 0x184024 is often set to 0x01 or 0x03, but not on all systems?
→Boot Partitions
+83
→User Partitions
+26
no edit summary
+28
no edit summary
+54
no edit summary
+246
no edit summary
no edit summary
+262
no edit summary
+785
Undo revision 1301 by Magic (talk)
+59
? it's definitely 81B on retail
-55
no edit summary
+55
no edit summary
+770
no edit summary
-5
→NAND structure
+158
→NAND structure
+82